THE SCANDAL: Follow the Money Trail! It's Hot!Liberty Ross WINS Bigger Than BIg

HALO Combat Evolved 2002 -
Campaign by Rupert Sanders for Bungie

REVIEWS:ONE OF THE BEST GAMES IN RECENT TIMES, ON ANY CONSOLE, BAR NONE.
2. "This is the most important launch game for any console, ever."
3. "Microsoft created the Xbox so we could have games like HALO."
4. "...HALO's single-player game is worth picking up an Xbox for alone."

About Bungie:

"Bungie was founded in 1991 with two goals: to develop games that combine brilliant technology, beautiful art, intelligent stories and deep gameplay, and then sell enough of those games to achieve our real goal of  total world domination."
(From Xbox manual for HALO Combat Evolved 2002) This was a Single Person Shooter Evolved to control the market. It was not expected to be a fantastic success but it was.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

HALO 1: $40 Billion sales worldwide
HALO 2: $60 Billion sales world wide
HALO 3: $120 Billion sales world wide
HALO 4:IDK
HALO 5: Just came out.

Rupert Sanders made about 1 million per year for 1,2,3. HALO 4 about 5 Million

screenshot HALO 5

HALO 5

Now here's the kicker folks! 

After 10 years of selling, his contract kicks in for Centennial benefits of percentage of sales from HALO 1 on up. So we are talking about 1 to 2 Billion dollars. The 10 years were up in 2012. And what happened to Rupert in July of 2012? SCANDAL

Rupert Sanders was already married to Liberty Ross BEFORE he worked on Bungie's HALO. California is a Community Property State. 50% of assets go to each party. When they married Rupert didn't have anything much and Liberty had a lot. Liberty had a pre- nup but probably Rupert did not as he did not have anything. 

But does he ever NOW!

Without the scandal Liberty Ross would get 50%. A very nice piece of change. With the Scandal she got even more. You can bet your farm on that.

Who wanted to move to California, a community property state, but which still abides by pre-nups? Who had everything to gain and nothing to lose?

Who had everything to gain by that SCANDAL and nothing to lose? 

Who had a fortune to lose?

Follow the money every time!

Who is a superlative Gamer, who was not upset by the Scandal, who seemed to revel in it, who tweeted it?

The Reason Why WE Have To BOYCOTT Tabloid Media!!!!!

1. Lainey of Lainey Gossip And Her TED Talk About Gossip BELOW!  Excellent!

   The reason why have to boycott tabloid media!!!!!

   THE HYENA’S LAW

   The Hyena’s law is aimed at protecting and preserving: blackmailers, intimidators, cheeky people, parasites, double faced people, envious, inmorals, money- lenders, cowards, betrayers, liars, greedy people, charlatans…and any human species of the kind.

   ARTICLE 1 
   We will oblige the celebrity to the have his/her life exposed and sold when the famous person may be profitable. Should the celebrity be opposed to have this done, we will use any resort to achieve our objetives. In fact it is widely known that celebrities are somehow “obliged” to sell their life. That is known “As the price of fame” and celebrities don’t have the right to be opposed to our right of collecting our benefits.

   ARTICLE 2
   If a celebrity makes our work impossible to be carried out we will have to do a bit of acting. We will have to make up an “alternative life” (invented) but according to our needs. We will need 3 accomplices to achieve this: somebody powerful willing help us in change for some benefits, an audience anxious to experience morb of any kind and lifeless individuals and pervert, will to sell his/her soul at any price. This will not be difficult as there will always be a soul-sale available.

   ARTICLE 3 
   Any crime whatsoever will remain unpunished. We will be able to use any means at within reach: lie, slander, libel, break-in, prosecution, being insulted, public offence, outrage…with at considering age or sex of the subject to who our actions are aimed at.

   ARTICLE 4 
   If we ever run into an innacessible celebrity the strategy will be as follows: 1_ We will create a manipulated scenario, as morbid and shocking as possible.
   2_ We will have to create believable story with made-up: names, dates, locations…making is possible to discredit the targeted celebrity.

   ARTICLE 5 
   We will completely protected by “powerful willing” of the article 2 , we will therefore be allowed to extend this story false as long as possible, collecting huge profit from it. We will have to insistently bringg this to public’s minds mentioning whatever “reliable source”,in our articles,we may come up with. We must bear in mind that the term “source” may seen tricky in the public’s minds, whom the story false is directed to. We will have to apply too this perfect equation: “ A time after time repeated lie turns out to be truthful lie”

   ARTICLE 6 
   The subject before mentioned in the article two, “the pervet”, must have certain attitudes: a) an exagerated ego. b) failure as a professional. c) extreme ambition. d) be inmoral. e) arrogance…That subject may rewarded according to these attitudes and the price of his/her soul. Once the purpose has been achieved, benefits collected, the celebrity life ruined, we will make the subject to fall in oblivion and his her mouth kept shit for ever.

   ARTICLE 7 
   This article is aimed at “ the ever hungry public”, public considering it indispensible as far as our benefits is concerned. Making up a story with the necessary ingedients, for example: cheated other person, infidelity, a substantial age-difference between the protagonist, manipulated pics, ambiguous exposures, false statements… “ morbid scandals”… all these things will lead to success.
   Our insistent attitude day by day will leave public minds mixed us therefore it will only a matter of time until this is accepted as general truth.

   Final conclusions.
   Our manipulation is likely to diminish as time goes by. The time value will be related to the means used. The money invested, media diffusion and the wide attention of public. People are likely to doubt the whole setup and even find out prop that might be used against us. We do not mind this as our objetive will be achieved, benefits distributed, the celebrity prestige ruined and we will remain anonymous. We will leave manipulation vanish in time while we set our eyes and minds on our next victim.
   ~By Coldminds.
   
   
2. 82ReblogLike

   katespencer

   Whether or not you are a fan of her site, Lainey of Lainey Gossip did a TED talk that is worth a watch. In it she discusses gender, motherhood, infidelity and celebrity and asks if they way we react to/treat celebrities and celebrity scandal (our obsession with celebrity moms, the slut-shaming of Kristen Stewart, the forgiveness of Ashton Kutcher and Chris Brown) says a lot more about ourselves and our society than we realize.